—
These Tea Party guys. These are not my kinda guys. (via muchlessmuchmore)
Well said.
—
These Tea Party guys. These are not my kinda guys. (via muchlessmuchmore)
Well said.
California will need high-speed rail in the coming years to do something about the gridlock on our roads and at our airports. Building it is a major investment, but the most recent estimates say it would cost twice as much over the next generation to build new highways and runways just to move the same number of people. With California expected to grow by 12 million people in the next 25 years, investment in the state’s transportation system is inevitable, and high-speed rail is a cost-effective alternative.
In the last 2 1/2 years the case for high-speed rail has gotten stronger, not weaker. When voters approved the plan, a barrel of oil cost about $55; today the price is almost $100. Unemployment was around 8 percent back then, and it is now over 12 percent statewide and even higher in many areas. Californians need the jobs.
”—
Case for high-speed rail grows only stronger - Sacramento Editorial | Sacramento Bee
Hear, hear.
Good article, especially all the references in movies to insults about characters not being able to drive. I never even noticed that before. I think it is because movies are made in L.A. where the public transportation is still sub-par. The part about 500 Days of Summer being originally set in San Francisco makes a WHOLE lot of sense. I couldn’t be sure exactly where they were for most of that movie!